Archive

Shopping

It seems that Amazon’s found yet another way to rake in money — as if selling record numbers of e-books wasn’t enough. When I loaded their homepage today, this is what I saw:

I like how they call it “sponsored screensavers.” I suppose it’s slightly better than “blatant advertisements that you have to look at every time you take your Kindle out of your bag.” And wait! It gets better! You can choose what you want your advertisements to look like.

It’s certainly an interesting idea, though I’m not sure how I feel about it. Amazon is playing off the (likely accurate) theory that customers will happily put up with advertising to pay a little less for the hottest e-reader on the market. But even if I didn’t care about ads showing up as my screensavers, I’m not sure I like the idea of being a walking advertisement — which is exactly what every single person who opts into this deal will be.

Amazon is allowing customers to vote on prospective screensavers, which opens up a whole bunch of other interesting ideas. I’m interested in the concept of consumers being given a voice, a new way to interact with advertisers and give feedback other than in ad revenue or, say, volume of click-throughs. I am also intrigued by the possibility that advertisements of this medium could become some sort of new art form. Obviously the most successful screensavers will be the most aesthetically pleasing ones, which means they’ll need to be interesting and/or artistic or at the very least, sexy.

This isn’t a new concept of course — advertisements that we see now already try to beat the competition by presenting the most interesting two-dimensional visual pitch they possibly can. But who really cares all that much about an advertisement that comes in a magazine or on the subway train? Screensavers, I feel, operate differently. On other electronic devices such as computers or smart phones or even other e-readers, people want their backgrounds and screensavers to be images they choose: favorite actors, cute animals, friend/family photos, beautiful landscapes, funny pictures, works of art. It seems like such a small thing, but it’s almost like we’ve been trained to care about our screensavers.

On the page listing more details about the sponsored screensavers (and other offers), you can see some sample screensavers — they’re not terribly impressive. But I expect this form of advertising will catch on, and I’m definitely interested to see what kind of ads companies start to produce when AdMash launches.

Click here to leave a comment.

Just had to share this laugh-out-loud moment. I did a search for a mandolin rack to let me store my mandolin by hanging it on the wall, and found this on Amazon.com:

I noticed that it had only one review, offering a rating of 3 stars. Curious, I scrolled down to find out what could possibly be so mediocre about three pieces of wood stuck together. And this is what I read:

“This works perfectly for what I wanted: only 4-cup holder I could find. Also, my kitchen is red oak. The mugs cover it, but it just looks home-made. Not sanded enough, drips in the stain. I solved my concern that the cups would fall off by wrapping rubber bands near the end of the pegs. The price is not high, but I still expected better quality. Disappointed.”

Whoever left this review clearly failed to read the product description: “This beautiful hardwood mount is designed to wall mount your mandolins perfectly, so they can easily be picked up and played.” Or even look at the product name: “Standard Mandolin Mount Domestic Red Oak.”

Three people indicated the review was helpful. I hope they were being sarcastic.  Maybe there needs to be a flashing red sign on this page saying, “THIS IS NOT A MUG HOLDER.”

Click here to leave a comment.

My new obsession: fashionable accessories for the camera-toting young woman. I find it so frustrating that the majority of the dSLR camera gear available on the market is boring and black. Not black in that sleek, trendy New Yorker way, but black in that I-only-come-in-one-style-and-it’s-not-even-really-a-style, harsh square edges, crappy-looking canvas material way.

Not to mention, these accessories are usually decorated with brand names, huge and bolded. And I don’t mean fashion-statement brand names like Louis Vuitton or Gucci. My camera came with an ugly strap that has “CANON” plastered across it in thick white letters. Yeah, you know the one I’m talking about. Are there really so few women in the photography world that companies don’t see trendy camera accessories as an untapped market with great potential? Hmph. I refuse to believe it.

All I can say is: THANK GOODNESS FOR ETSY. On Etsy you will find a large variety of cute camera strap covers, handmade to fit whatever you’re using. Here are some by SillyJilllyBoutique, who I believe offers the cheapest ones (and in the greatest variety of funky prints). The first two are the ones I absolutely adore most:

And a couple lovely ones by HowardAvenue:

On Etsy you will find LENS COZIES — whoever dreamed up that we would need these? Of course we don’t actually need them…but we’re women. We want them. We will always be able to rationalize a need for these things.

By Sarah Goldschadt (Goldylocks):

Okay, I admit, maybe these animal ones are slightly on the weird side. It’s definitely my honey bee obsession that makes me partial to the crocheted bee cozy. But check out the ones below!

By GypsyRoseHandbags:

By TracyJoy:

But here is the must-have accessory that has me OBSESSED. On Etsy you will find these GORGEOUS, GORGEOUS CAMERA GEAR BAGS. By Ketti Handbags:

The woman who makes these even saves you the trouble of thinking up a rationale: “Who wants to be toting around a giant camera bag that screams ‘I’m full of expensive gear?’ Not me.”

Me neither! Plus, why should we have to compromise fashion for photography? Swear to god, I will be purchasing one of these the moment I have the discretionary income for it. Or I’ll beg for one for my birthday. Whichever comes first.

A couple of other ones I love…

By GypsyRoseHandbags:

By JanineKingDesigns:

On a side note, I can’t wait for the day that Etsy makes it possible for people to purchase generic, Etsy-wide gift cards. It’ll be the best day of my life. Well, not really. But close enough.

Click here to leave a comment.

These days e-readers seem to be coming out of the woodwork from all over the place.  Every time a new one pops up, I wonder if someone’s finally made something better than Amazon’s Kindle.  I love my Kindle, though I do make an effort not to be biased when I look at other products.

Today I went to the Barnes & Noble at Union Square to play with a Nook for the very first time.  I’ve read about it, watched videos on it, looked at pictures of it…but this was the first time I actually got to touch and interact with one.

My first thought: ooh, shiny.  I have to hand it to B&N — they definitely made a very aesthetically appealing e-reader.  Perhaps the most aesthetically appealing of them all, at the present moment.  The rubbery back made it feel comfortable and sturdy in my hands, and the front of it is definitely a sleeker design than the Kindle.

But once I turned it on, I discovered that actually trying to navigate through the Nook is a bit of a nightmare.  The tiny strip of color touchscreen at the bottom tries to imitate an iPhone setup, but completely lacks the intuition that makes the iPhone fun and easy to use.  (Side note: the touch screen layout is not the only part where they’re blatantly copying Apple.  There’s a whole Nook area in the B&N store at Union Square where Nooks are on display and Nook specialists are waiting to help you. I’ll give you three words for where that idea comes from:  Apple Genius Bar.)

Between the black and white E-Ink screen and the color touch screen, it’s kind of hard to decide which your eyes should be looking at when you’re trying to navigate through the books and documents.  On the Kindle there is only one screen for everything to go to, and Amazon’s developed a logical system for organizing things.  It may not be the most efficient at times, but at least it’s intuitive.  The Nook, on the other hand, organizes certain things on the E-Ink screen, but sorts other things on the touch screen.  It’s hard to figure out where to look for what.  And because you keep your fingers out and at the ready for doing things on the touchscreen pad, you find yourself repeatedly tapping the E-Ink screen, attempting to work it like it’s also touch-sensitive.

After just a few minutes, I gave up trying to figure out how the Nook worked.  Aesthetics are always good, but it’s crucial to strike a balance between the pretty and the ease of use.  I had my Kindle figured out within a matter of seconds after the first time I charged it up, and I’ve never been confused about it, nor have I ever read the manual for it.  If you’re looking to hit the mass market, that’s the way your product needs to work.

What B&N has really been trying to promote is the Nook’s lending feature and how it’ll let you read any book for free when you’re in an actual Barnes & Noble.  Yeah, these capabilities might sound pretty good in an advertisement…until you read the fine print.  First of all, you can only lend a book if the publisher has agreed to this option (and not very many have).  Then the book disappears from your own Nook for fourteen days while it’s being “lent” out to your friend…and then guess what?  You can never ever lend out that same book ever again.  And the read-for-free-in-a-store option?  Apparently it’s limited to just one hour.  All in all, these features aren’t really worth the money, especially when you consider that Kindle books tend to be cheaper.

Barnes & Noble can be smug about their device all they like, but I suspect they were forced into releasing the Nook really as a strategy to retain those once-loyal customers that they were in danger of losing to the Kindle.  It’s too bad that business has to work like that.  I think if B&N had waited a little bit longer for the E-Ink technology to improve some more, they might actually have had a shot at creating something more interesting than just another e-reader trying way too hard to be something it’s not.

And for comparison’s sake, here is the Amazon Kindle:

Click here to leave a comment.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.